Giphy plans to build a real business | Hacker News Reader

Giphy plans to build a real business

businessinsider.com

61 pointsokfine37 comments

The service is cute. No doubt about it.

All the best to the team to find a way to monetize, however. Seems like the advertising route may be the most promising.

Giphy's among numerous sites I've blocked at the domain level because the principle use is to create an annoyance: animations which cannot otherwise be blocked or stopped, frequently used to directly annoy those who've stated that they don't care for such things.

Aside: two of the biggest blow-ups I've seen in social media have been between those who don't, and do, like animations. Go figure.

Unless and until user tools (e.g., browsers) put this control directly in users' hands, I don't see the situation improving.

Despite Giphy's broad distribution network, it doesn't seem that Gif Artists can be compensated for their labor in the way Youtube Creators can.

Nor would a watermarked Gif Ad, like the one I just saw for Netflix's "War Machine" provide much more than what amounts to CDN hosting fees for Giphy's platform. Minus any content licensing.

Hiring and developing Gif talent, building a Creators' Studio and marketing any resulting new IPs falls into the same conundrum: endusers copy, share and consume Gif images freely.

As for mobile ads, its the engagement, such as redeeming a Memorial Day promotion code for Lyft, that is monetized. Not the content.

We could hypothesize and analyze the remaining possible revenue models but unless Gifs can somehow be transmuted into some sort of cryptocurrency or other store of value, I am just having a hard time wrapping my head around this one.

How do you build Paywalls for Gifs? And aren't Snap and Insta Stories the new "micro reality entertainment" channels?

Wishing Alex and co. best of luck!

You want to use apps/mobile as much as possible to control the experience.

Giphy is mostly used to host content to be posted on third party sites. An upload app would be useful but by no means crucial, and nowhere near as trafficked as the content itself.

Did the maths a while back, the amount of money they've spent commissioning GIFs from artists for their Studio program is a small fraction that Electric Objects has spent.

They can do demographic tracking, brand tracking and other retargeting type advertising.

IMO Giphy has raised far too much money to ever be a viable business.

Giphy employs 70 people. This I find an astonishing high number.

It also seems that they are partnered with netflix to automatically create gifs from their content; this is interesting. But what about content providers who aren't so happy about unauthorized clips being created of their content - I would have thought giphy is a copyright disaster, should owners assert their rights.

> But what about content providers who aren't so happy about unauthorized clips

There is no way that netflix will jeopardize their distribution licenses for a few gifs. Anything that comes from it is no doubt cleared and above board.

I think they mean all the other content providers, besides Netflix, whose content is on Giphy.

DMCAing a gif off the internet has got to be near impossible.

I think advertisement and licensing/subscription are the way go along with providing a motion recognition engine. They have gifs which are basically frames of motions. Wouldn't be good to have a search engine tells you which movie this gif was based on, an anotation like genius for explaining memes and slangs?

They have a search API with a public key https://github.com/Giphy/GiphyAPI with limits. I used it in one of my apps. Pretty cool stuff.

There are VC-funded startups that fulfill a semi-real need, but lack any potential to become a real business. "Advertising" isn't a business model; it's a crutch one reaches for when an existing business isn't financially sustainable on its own.

Giphy should be an open source library or app, or perhaps a community-supported site, that people would use on occasion. Expecting it to drive traffic that justifies a VC-scale investment will only dilute a generally useful service and cause it to fall by the wayside when the VCs pull out.

True it would be probably be better. But we live in a culture that glorifies the slick salesman who pulls himself up by his bootstraps. Think Leonardo DiCaprio in Wolf of Wall Street. This is going to continue to happen with a large host of products. And the very same community we are currently posting in helped build it.

I mean imgur is the pioneer in this space... advertising seems like a fine business.

Imgur is not even remotely the pioneer. They're the most recent in a long line of image hosts that built up a userbase with a simple functional website, followed by sacrificing that to be able to serve ads.

while I agree that "advertising isn't a business model", truly accepting that means accepting that the majority of the Internet is broken and will fail.

I think Google and Facebook depend on advertising

Google (Alphabet) and Facebook are internet advertising.

http://image-store.slidesharecdn.com/f0a87be0-b176-4d80-ae8f...

thats the point. If advertising is a failing/bad business model, you are betting against them.

"Advertising" isn't a business model; it's a crutch one reaches for when an existing business isn't financially sustainable on its own.

Advertising is absolutely a business model; it funds not only most of what you see on the internet, but much of what you watch on TV.

Now is it the best business model for every company? Obviously not.

> "Advertising" isn't a business model

Someone alert Larry and Sergey, right away!

Go to https://giphy.com/ and take a look. Does this random collection of animated images give the impression of a service worth 600 million dollars? It's just fluff, it doesn't solve any real-world problem, how on earth would any VC be brave enough to invest $150m in this juvenile idea?

The same reason that they would use to invest in a platform which allows only 140 characters to be posted.

Because we're in a bubble

I think there's interest because people are starting to communicate (express emotions, ideas, thoughts, etc) with each other using gifs/media more and more. Having a service that categorizes and easily serves this method of complex communication could be of interest. I'm not saying 600m, but that's my line of thinking.

It's really interesting, and also when I began to feel old. Snapchat filters, the popularity of livestreaming, 50% or more of message stream being gifs, etc.

Isn't entertainment reason enough? And the problem they are solving is to allow others to send memes that are unique and funny or otherwise entertaining given a simple search string.

It's not sending someone to the moon, but it's also not worthless. The system itself would benefit from hard technical solutions as well. Facial recognition in gifs; understanding context in a picture... you may see it as a waste, but it may also lead to discovery some new CS techniques for these things.

I'm not necessarily saying they can show a value of 600m, but I would just dismiss the whole idea either.

Since it's integrated in Telegram as "@gif", I tried to use it many times to search for famous gifs or famous clips of some movie/series that are relevant to the conversation... 19 out of 20 I can't find it, results are irrelevant, and I have to search something like "site:imgur.com <thing>" in google images and select type: animated.

If at least this worked half of the time, I may say it is valuable.

Sure, but they don't even do the gif search all that well. I tend to go just about anywhere else to hunt for gifs. When I go to giphy, my computer slows to a crawl and the fan starts blasting on high as a result of the webpage trying to immediately load way. too. many. animated gifs all at once. And I wouldn't even dream of going there when I'm using my cell phone's data plan; a single page load would probably chew through a couple bucks' worth of my monthly allotment.

Other sites (Google image search, for example) let me look at a single frame static preview, and only look at the animated versions of the gifs that look promising. That works quite a bit better for me. It's even faster, since it's hard to browse anything when your browser's become unresponsive.

They may have captured the hearts of some segments of the market, but things like that leave me thinking they've got a long way to go before wider appeal is a realistic possibility. Meanwhile, challengers are sprouting like mushrooms.

I wonder, Giphy is far from technological advanced and can be copied by others easily. I know, you need the user base and so on but still, why should it be worth so much money? But it is not like you have a very personal engagement on the website and are unable to switch like you are on facebook when all your friends are there. Giphy is for me a bit like a URL-shortener service, if something better pops up, a lot of people will switch.

I figure they have good revenue from whatsapp integration, but can't let their business be held ransom by a large customer.

I find non video gif pretty much shocking. So much bandwidth wasted. I hope they don't do that anymore.

How is a business that isn't profitable and has no business model for revenue worth 600 million dollars? How are these valuations actually done?

Investor demand for shares.

Giphy is the slowest, buggiest site I sometimes have the displeasure of using. Unusable on mobile if you ever get linked to it, the search is mostly useless and results are irrelevant. Loading an actual gif takes ages.

Just giving stuff away for free and expecting to be able to slap on a business model later just seems like a recipe for failure in general, only very few companies manage to survive, let alone thrive, with that start.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com