Pakistani lawyer petitions for death of Mark Zuckerberg
theregister.co.uk
theregister.co.uk
No international enforcement agency is going to take this seriously, and specifically with regard to INTERPOL, their constitution would seem to disallow them any involvement in this matter:
Article 3: It is strictly forbidden for the Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.
http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/LegalMaterials/constitut...
Would Interpol get involved in a case involving defamation of a head of state? Does that change if the head of state is also a religious figure? (Both the Queen of England and the Roman Catholic Pope are religious figures.)
Heck - did Interpol get involved when the Pope was shot?
These questions are relevant because there's not always a bright line. Are laws against murder religious? ("Thou Shalt not Kill" is one of the commandments.) If not, then why is a civil law against saying the wrong thing about the flying spaghetti monster? What about a law banning non-believers from Mecca?
"...defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Muhammad ...shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable for fine."
Death AND a fine.
Edit: This was a weak attempt at sarcasm. Apologies to anyone who was offended. I do not condone the idea of the Pakistani government killing Mr. Zuckerberg because of some Facebook stunt.
The Register isn't affiliated with the Pakistani Police and their decision to investigate Facebook; they just report news.
Religious orthodoxy = idiocy