Questions to Ask When Interviewing at a Startup
instigatorblog.com
instigatorblog.com
The answer is always telling,.. even if they don't know what I mean.
They should tell you about funding, if they won't divulge burn rates, you can usually factor $8K-$15K/employee/month for a grossed up burn rate (ie: salaries, rent, equipment leases, travel, etc.). Startups that are more hardware-centric and/or have a large sales force (which == travel) are on the upper end of that. A dozen guys squatting in Class B office space building a webapp are going to be on the lower end.
1. What equity will I get and what form will it take? 2. What are the total outstanding shares in the company (fully diluted)? 3. What is the total dollar value of the investor liquidation preference?
You can get 100,000 options vesting over 4 years, for example, but this could represent potentially 1% of the company (if 10M shares are outstanding) or one-tenth of 1% if 100M shares are outstanding or any other percentage depending on the total capitalization structure. In the one case, on a $100M acquisition (assuming pro rata participation by all parties), you would get $1M and, in the other, $100K. Key point: the absolute number of shares is much less important than the percentage they represent of company ownership.
Same scenario but assuming preferred stock in place holding $50M of liquidation preference and full participation rights beyond the preference amount: in the $100M acquisition scenario, your 100K of options would net you $500K if there are 10M shares outstanding (1% of the $50M that is left after payment of the $50M liquidation preference) and $50K if there are 100M (.01% of the net $50M amount). Key point: outstanding liquidation preferences can (and often do) materially reduce the equity return to common shareholders, particularly if the company is sold in a marginal acquisition (in an extreme case, the preferred investors can force a sale where founders and employees get nothing).
Of course, if you haven't vested in full, and you don't have any accelerated vesting on acquisition, the numbers get shaved even more. Say you worked 2 years at the startup on a 4-year vesting schedule, you would net $500K in the best case under the above examples (1% potential ownership that is 50% vested, no liquidation preference) and $25K in the worst case (.01% potential ownership that is 50% vested with $50M liquidation preference).
These days, many who join startups as employees after the early stages are generally aware of the above issues but it never hurts to remember them if the major reason you are joining is for the hope of a large potential equity payout (if the terms you get are good apart from the equity, and you see it as more of a "tip" if things happen to go well, then these issues are of course much less important to you).
Capitalization questions are awkward to raise in an interview but are important if equity is key to the offer. Interview as is best for you, then, but make sure to consider these points in deciding how to finalize your deal.
Asking this shows interest in the company, asking "How long can you guarantee that you can pay my salary?" sends a very bad signal of among other things risk aversion. The employees of startup have to have a healthy appetite for risk....
I didn't have to ask, which I considered a good sign for both organizations.
No-one ever objected. In fact, most places seemed glad I was interested and thought it was a reasonable request. It was pretty common to be asked to wait until the second interview, though, as most places wouldn't be kitted up to do this without notice.
This is a great question for an engineer to ask. Being able to see if the code is smart (e.g. using shorthand instead of multiline logic), neat and documented is a great way to get a feel for how your potential future coworkers work. They've spent the last two to four hours grilling you and know you, how you code and how you solve problems pretty intimately -- why not get to know them better, too?
It takes about 15 minutes for me to satisfy myself if it's good, and how good.
The question I WISH I'd asked was around retention. i.e. "Of the people who touch this product, how many come back a second time? How many are addicted?" The company was well-financed and the sales machine sold the product REALLY well. But users didn't love it-- and most eventually churned.
But the questions don't change drastically in other types of startup either. Maybe some of the financials do, but questions about founders, business fundamentals, metrics that are focused on, how employees are assessed, etc. remain true regardless of whether it's a funded startup, bootstrapped, revenue generating, profitable or otherwise.
These days, equity is for founders (if you're serious) and prospective employees who didn't get the memo about the .com bust (if you're both fools). A fixed salary at a credible professional rate is for prospective employees you respect, possibly with some clearly defined bonus structure.
YMMV, but I haven't seen any exceptions to this from either side of the table in a long time.
Of course it's an outlier, but do you really believe Facebook isn't going to make a lot of its early employees rich at some point?
"What past success and experience do the founders have?"
"Well, we've been involved in small projects individually like a b and c. But we've surrounded ourselves by great advisors like Mr. W who did x in 2001. And Mr. Y who was CTO at Z Corp."
etc.