> Most scripts are either headless chrome instances using phantom is or selenium.
I would think that using regular HTTP requests is better/more popular then running a headless browser for this kind of work. cUrl, Python Requests, etc.
I would think that using regular HTTP requests is better/more popular then running a headless browser for this kind of work. cUrl, Python Requests, etc.
These don't need a headless browser.
What you're saying makes sense if you're looking at a handful of sites, but it doesn't scale very well compared to a universal solution for monitoring several retailers at once. It's definitely the more wasteful solution, if you are concerned about bandwidth and resource consumption, though.
again, minimal sophistication is required to dominate. most of the developers are not doing deep exploration. you just need to be faster than someone moving a mouse or using an auto-fill script.