> Sometimes we overcomplicate the simplest shit.
Indeed. Why not use nc and telnet on port 443 to test? Linux already has nc and Windows already has telnet.
Indeed. Why not use nc and telnet on port 443 to test? Linux already has nc and Windows already has telnet.
You could of course use nc as the client too, but it would be an additional install on Windows. [0]
And nc wouldn't help if the firewall was stateful and actually expected to see HTTPS traffic on port 443, so I do see their logic of putting an actual webserver there.
But without sufficient detail, it does seem at first glance to be overkill ;-)
Bear in mind the server was at the Windows end, so no good with telnet over that side...