I can guarantee you this is not the case. This comment is honestly so thoroughly full of misconceptions about the nature of IQ and IQ testing that it reads like a troll.
IQ is meant to measure g, or 'general intelligence'. it's roughly the ability to solve complex tasks, and tends to span across domains (ie, if you are above average in one area of problem-solving, you are likely to be above average in others): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)
>While at it, show me an IQ test that was compiled using my first language since you are dismissing facts I put on the table.
just for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven%27s_Progressive_Matrices
1. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/iq-tests-are-funda...
2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2250681/IQ-te...
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient#Criticis...
it looks very defensive to simply ignore my responses that directly answered your challenges and say 'oh yeah well i can google things'. you may also try not to rely on tabloids for science reporting.
[1] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=iq+and+life+expectancy&...
[2] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=iq+and+job+performance&...
[3] https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=iq+and+education&btnG=&...