Districts like Delaware have a vested interest in being a business friendly place to file your corporation papers. They won't likely allow the district to become an easy place to file phoney patent suits. And in districts where the companies actually reside will be even less likely to let through these time wasters that damage their biggest employers and shrink their tax base.
I'm not trolling, I just don't get the argument.
Could somebody explain this point in detail? Surely the law is the law regardless of where in the country a case is heard.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/why-do-patent-trolls-g...
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/168087-stopp...
The judicial branch is in charge of that interpretation. That interpretation is based on the wording of laws passed by Congress combined with the prescident set by previous judicial rulings.
The judge in Marshall, TX would find with a strong bias to the plaintiffs side[1]
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/why-do-patent-trolls-g...
I am curious what jurisdiction you have experience with where the law is applied so evenhandedly. We could learn from them.