I laughed at Posterous, but they proved me wrong
blog.dustincurtis.com
blog.dustincurtis.com
The main draw of Posterous to me has been the quality: The blogs look great as-is, they have a powerful HTML/CSS editor, the comments are great, etc.
With Posterous, if there is any idea/thought in my head, I simply write down an email and send it to post@posterous.com. If I have images to post, instead of uploading them one by one, I simply forward them to Posterous and hey, I get a nice image gallery on my blog. Even better, with Posterous' iPhone app, I could send any interesting picture straight from my camera to my blog. What I realized that I had created lot of artificial barrier to updating my blog and Posterous took it all away. I use Posterous exclusively through email (unless I need to delete/fix post) and I think it rocks!
If you just write text and post pictures, email is great.
In Clayton Christensen's book The Innovator's Dilemma, he discusses two types of disruptive innovations:
1) Low-end disruptions
These serve less demanding customers with low-priced, relatively straightforward offerings using low-cost business models. Look for markets with over-served customers and offer a simpler product or service.
2) New-market disruptions
These serve new customers by making it easier for them to do something that previously required being or hiring specialists. Look for unfulfilled needs and create new products or services for them.
Posterous is a great example of a low-end disruption. They're offering a product so damn simple that few realized it would have such an impact (like Dustin Curtis). And now they've got features that early adopters and perhaps some early majority want as well (the rich-text editor). Pretty shrewd of them.
Sounds more like twitter/facebook updates. Believe there is a higher quality bar for blog posts.
> I would worry about post formatting, title of the post, my potential readers etc.
That's what I do and more (multiple drafts) when writing most blog posts. I expect bloggers I read regularly to at least attempt the same.
Honestly, I think this is more of an indictment of the current state of desktop email than anything wrong with Posterous.
I don't know anything about their blogging service, but as far as registering for services goes, this idea is gold.
On the whole there is a lot to get wrong in this authentication method. I would prefer if this doesn't spread to other web apps.
Addresses some of those issues.
>> Email can easily be spoofed, but Posterous has come up with some ways to figure out if the email we receive comes from you. If we think it might not be you, we ask you to confirm the email before we post it.
No matter what, you always get an email notification of every post we put online for your blog, with an easy link to remove the post if you didn't do it.
I'm sure a lot of people would be interested in those numbers. I always assumed a tiny percentage of the WP userbase would employ that particular feature since it's kinda geeky... but definitely would like to know because it does have may implications for other webapp owners.
PS: Congrats on the 3.0 release :) Will be upgrading a couple of sites tomorrow.
Belief and perseverance is everything.
I honestly don't care about the founder stories (good for them, sucks for them, end of story). But the articles do really focus on the founders more than features, and people are known to be silly (hence the never-dying market for tabloids).
The author's argument is that the attitude of "email is the simplest way to post to a blog" is part of why the rest of the design is clean.
But how many people want to maliciously post to some random person's Posterous blog? Probably not too many.
They wouldn't necessarily even have to get you to click on a link. There have been numerous attacks against image processing libraries.
Maybe Smear Campaign artists might take to it. Or spammers...
I've just created a posterous account at http://pmn.posterous.com
The email that I've authorized is paul@pmn.org
I've put one post on there, any other posts that appear are not from me.
(I should note, I use Posterous for some personal stuff and love the service. This isn't something I've been terribly concerned about yet.)
I've removed the extra one, so it should be back down to one.
What did you welcome email say?
I think they're going to end up just as safe as every other blogging service out there.
ATTENTION: We noticed you're sending this from a different
computer or location, so it won't get posted until we're
sure it's you. Please confirm that you sent this.
So, it looks like they've thought about this problem already.Michael Arrington posted the results here: http://techcrunch.posterous.com/lots-of-fake-post-attempts-o...
The tech landscape is never fully conquered and all it takes is one inspired, and sometimes obvious, innovation to open the field back up.
And even then. A lot of times Company X does implement Y and it doesn't kill or even slow the startup down. There are probably many reasons behind this. Fundamentally though I think people should just stop asking this question. Or not treat it as such a big deal. Because it's not in the grand scheme of things.
Though, having it be the driving selling feature... I would have found that quite ridiculous. But, what do I know, I am over 30. My ideas about what the current youth generation want is outdated. I didn't even think like most of them when I was that age.
Posting by email makes complete sense
Yes... in hindsight.Another blogging interface that makes sense to me is a message board. Each blogger would have a forum (subforums would be allowed and would represent all of that blogger's blogs). Each thread (the first post of the thread) in the forum represents a blog post, and others' replies to the thread become the blog comments.
I think that idea might have some legs, as it could help a lot with discoverability. But what do I know?
But, it seems to be wrapping around as the "new hot tech" again because this generation of users has forgotten about it.
On that note, it would be a neat trick if Posterous handled encrypted mail...
Just don't make the mistake I did: forget to set up your imap server to use TLS as well.
What I was more imagining is where if you are in some cube-hell and your boss walked by and saw you on some website typing away, it is easily recognizable. But if you had Outlook up, typing away, it isn't near as noticeable.
One of those office work things, sort of like how old video games had a Boss key.
I've seen enough people doing slack-off stuff like this.
can anyone confirm/deny this? I've thought of using something like that for other ideas and wonder if it works, and if so at what volume you need etc.
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/11/our-amazon-advertising...
"So, onward to plan B: we now auto-insert Stack Overflow affiliate info into any amazon book links posted on Stack Overflow. Oh yeah, and here’s the kicker. These silly little rewritten text links work 200%-300% better than our custom amazon book ads!"
They each all have their own business model, Tumblr I think is still tweaking theirs but they currently offer paid themes. Tumblr users are incredibly supportive of Tumblr.
Same goes for WP, and I'm sure Posterous. You will have the casual 'free' users, and you'll have the users who will actually shell out a significant amount to support their blogging medium.
It really is up to the user/s to decide what best suits them. The advantage is the choice