There are other ways too, like requiring employees to pay for parking...
Housing is less expensive further away from the center of urban areas, but transportation is much less developed.
Housing is less expensive further away from the center of urban areas, but transportation is much less developed.
Unless you're talking about requiring employees to pay for parking which they're not using, this is not wage theft. To the contrary, the inequity would be if free parking was provided to workers who drove to work but no similar subsidy was provided to those who took public transit. (In Canada, free employee parking is in most cases a taxable benefit.)
Really? Does it work the other way too? My employer will reimburse a small amount of public transit costs, but the people that drive get no similar benefit.