'Why did eBay side with the buyer when he returned my Apple MacBook?'
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
We did customer analysis to show that existing customers were leaving faster than new ones were coming in. Usually people have one bad experience and never come back. They still didn't care and given their culture they will never care until their stock plummets or a real competitor comes along.
Amazon, for it's side, is opening up to sellers. From secondhand sellers to etsy type products getting listed on Amazon. It's focus is different: getting many producers/middlemen to list the same products.
Ebay is working to get part of the logistics, payment, etc. in house. Ebay used to be just a listing site. But then payment came into ebay (with a hefty fee raise I might add), and now we see the focus on ebay to classify things the way Amazon does. You're seeing that when you sell something on ebay. Ebay will ask "is it like this ?" and then ask a few questions to determine the exact product.
Seems like both companies are evolving toward the same middle ground.
Amazon has bigger fish to fry than eBay. Amazon can always focus on second hand market place later while leveraging their infrastructure to ensure a win. My bet is that they will take a long time to get around to it. In the meantime phone based and social based have a pretty good shot at competing. This will also take a long time.
eBays efforts to take on Amazon at being Amazon is a total waste of what little focus they have. Like Yahoo, one of the best perks of eBay is that it's hard to get fired. It's very relaxed and people are quite comfortable - why risk an easy / safe job by taking a risk doing something innovative. After a while innovative people get jack of it and leave and all you're left is the lazy and incompetent. There are pockets of excellence within eBay but they're getting smaller. There was a potential for a turnaround when the stock price was $10 but at $30+ no-one is interested.
They side with the buyers. Bad behavior, or fraud, on the part of buyers isn't interesting to them when the seller is a 3rd party because they have no skin in the game. They want that buyer more than they want you.
There's no escalation point either. Push back, and the fraudulent buyer will just file a chargeback. The credit card companies are even worse about siding with buyers engaging in return fraud.
For me, it's just the cost of doing business. I have to pad my margin to account for it. Assholes like the buyer depicted in the article just make prices higher for everyone else.
Edit: It might be interesting if some fairly ubiquitous payment processor offered a shared buyer blacklist. I suppose though, nobody wants to expose themselves to the potential lawsuits. If it were managed well, by only allowing fairly established, higher volume sellers, to add to the list, it might work well.
The article claimed eBay looked into the buyer's history and didn't see anything else like this. Maybe they didn't look hard, or maybe this was their first time, but such a thing wouldn't have helped in this case, at least.
Personally, I think credit card companies should send back something like "percentage of purchases with a chargeback" and let us decide how risky we want to be.
I sold an old phone on eBay for $100. I choose PayPal as the payment and everything seemingly went fine. A few weeks later I wondered where my money was because I still didn't have it. The buyer had sent it but apparently I forgot to 'accept' it. eBay said I had waited too long and no longer had a right to get the money. So the buyer got my phone, eBay got the $100, and I had to pay $8 in seller fees. Sold a phone for negative $8. How is that not fraud?
This is like the old snail mail scam: insert extra bills for common things (like electricity or tax or whatnot) with fake payment instructions (ie. pointing to an account under your control). Suckers pay, then a month later receive another bill from the power company and complain, but of course the power company has no idea about any of that payment and will, of course, still insist on payment.
Make sure to go to paypal's site to verify paypal payments (and frankly if you can avoid it: don't use paypal). Check the sites YOU GO TO, not what ends up in your inbox.
I was considering starting a marketplace on Amazon last year as well with a friend, just selling basic Chinese made goods but it sounds like things like this are rampant there too, and honestly I'm seeing a lot of sellers on Amazon lately that are scammers, so I'm beginning to lose faith in Amazon as a consumer as well.
If I'm going to try and make a business from selling goods online I would want to run my own ecommerce shop using shopify or something similar.
My marketplace of choice is Craigslist. I meet up with the buyer, they inspect the item, and pay me in cash if all looks good. There is no room for monkey business. I usually set up these meetings in front of the closest police station in order to keep everyone safe. A few times buyers have come to the lobby of my office building. I've never had an unhappy buyer after having sold dozens of items over the last decade or so.
You can argue whether eBay's policies should default to favoring the buyer or the seller but they pretty much have to do one or the other. Even if their customer service were better than it is, it's not in the position to do a forensic investigation in cases where the facts are in dispute and can't be easily determined.
Edit: My classic example was one case where the buyer claimed "item not received". It was a one-off, custom item, and quite expensive. So, I was pissed off enough to hire a private investigator to go to the place of business. The item was there. The PI took pictures of the item, with the buyer's business (including signage) in the background. I submitted them in the counter dispute. I also had one of his employee's signature on a UPS delivery slip. Still lost. Their reasoning was that the signature was not the buyer's signature (no matter that it was the buyer's employee's signature). They didn't mention the incriminating pictures at all in the final outcome.
This was more of a principal thing. You can imagine these days I just shrug and move on.
eBay simply does not care. No matter what you do, if a buyer tries to scam you, you will lose.
The last straw for me was a MacBook sale. I took great care of it and listed it in great condition and included pictures. The buyer considered it "good" not great condition and after several back and forths arguing I sent him $50 to buy a cover. I searched around for information and experiences from others during the process and eventually realized that he had all the control and eBay essentially always sides with buyers. I'm glad I only got taken for $50 instead of the outcome from the story. Never again though. F eBay
I'm sure I could have gotten more with a private sale but then there's the risk and the hassle. (I live far enough outside of the nearest major city that Craigslist doesn't really work for me in general.)
The cases that the seller does want a return, you really can't say no. I usually just say yes, I can process a return, but can you explain what is wrong with the item? Maybe we can walk through it before processing a full return. Usually you can get away with compensating them something since no one wants to go through the hassle of the return.
I also make sure I tell them to ship with signature confirmation and tracking. Since I offer "free shipping", that means they would have to eat all the costs when they return the item. More often than not, it's not worth the hassle for them.
After hundreds of sales, I would say there are definitely some complications, but more often than not it's fine. It's one of the risks you have to consider when selling.
There really is a hole in the market for goods in this price bracket.
I would almost want some Ebay certified place that could verify the item and act as an escrow.
Too many crap bidders, no way to block them. Ebays logic was that they "didn't want to discourage new users" or some nonsense.
Or sue the buyer in small claims?