I don't believe you, please show me some peer reviewed science instead of waiving around some ^hokey-pokey^ rubbery belief.
It seems you were making the argument that even if autism was linked to vaccines, the benefit would outweigh the cost. Now you are attacking me on a different point (that I didn't make)
Interesting article on role of social media. Obviously you are a hard core, a non-fence sitter, so I'll ignore you.
[0] http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/how-twitter-more-accur...
Vaccines are also a classic flamewar topic that, unless there's something genuinely new to be said, are off-topic here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
Yes you're write Dang. Incivility vs factual evidence. Maybe I should be more tactful.
Facts not superstition, reducibility through empiricism. Rational thought instead emotion. Ideas like this were fought and won during ^the Enlightenment^ some 200 to 250 years ago. [0]