The North American wolves are not their European brethren in body count (far from it).
The North American wolves are not their European brethren in body count (far from it).
Another article about a similar situation that trhway posted below: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/may/21/nation/la-na-nn-dena...
TLDR: Hunter kills a horse in a creek, fouling it for the local residents who rely on it & making them boil their water so its drinkable (very expensive to do).
Said hunter used dead horse to kill the majority of one of the most well known wolf packs out there, this hunter successfully fucked over the locals water supply, and gave the National Parks Service hard data that getting rid of the buffer zone was bad (as these wolves were part of their study.
Seems ridiculous to allow people to shit all over state & federal lands, creating serious health hazards and killing tourism.
Using one idiot to brand all ranchers is pretty reprehensible especially because waving that bloody shirt has no part in the argument I put forward.
Also, I'm not branding ranchers here, just idiots with guns calling themselves "hunters", which the asshat in the aforementioned article is far from being. Idiots like him have caused public sentiment about hunting to turn negative, which is bad for the rest of us as that means more restrictions & rules.
What association should I draw from your response with that story to my proposal? He was an idiot, but there are idiots everywhere.
http://www.publiclandsranching.org/book.htm
"Welfare Ranching: The Subsidized Destruction of the American West"
They are killing the Profanity Peak pack as we speak because a rancher refused to not let his cattle graze unmonitored right next to their den. Why should I have to pay because some rancher refuses to move his cattle to some other land he also doesn't have to pay to use?
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/profani...
What, seriously? That sounds absurd. A bison is a wild animal; why would it ever be reasonable to expect any human or group of humans to take responsibility for its behavior?
Most bison in the USA are not wild game animals and have to follow the sames rules as any other ranch animal.
I cannot fairly comprehend the entitled mentality needed for me to ever think that. Shit happens, quit whining. No matter, it's a poor analogy. The government is subsidizing ranchers because the government said, "can't shoot 'em." "Well, WTF are we supposed to do, then?", say the ranchers. So the government pays per carcass.
No, the rancher is not. That's what those yellow diamond "entering open range" signs mean. In fact, you hit a head of cattle in open range, you're paying for the ranchers loss.
As an aside, how is a cow supposed to "hit my car" in the first place? They might exceed 20 mph if spooked, otherwise it's like saying that a pedestrian hit your car. The fact that said pedestrian weighs upward of 1200 lbs. does not absolve you, pilot of the 70 mph 4000lb. box of steel.
I watched a bison (juvenile) hit a parked car. On a twisty road we lost a motorcycle driver to a bison that had got out. A bull will attack a car. Cows can panic too.
"Save for occasionally colliding with motorists on the highway, goring a horse at guest ranches, moving through fences or tramping upon manicured landscaping, bison presence in Jackson Hole does not connote the political calamity it does in Montana."
http://www.jhnewsandguide.com/opinion/columnists/the_new_wes...
I'm surprised that livestock guarding dogs were not mentioned in the article. Some breeds are known to prevent attacks by merely displaying aggressive behavior toward predators without actually harming neither the wolves nor themselves.
1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SX5GvhIF2j4
2) https://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/guard-don...
Maybe you're suggesting the wolves would forget how to hunt because they are constantly being fed by ranchers? This might be possible.
Either way, the key to implementing a policy like this would be testing it out with a small subset of Wyoming and measuring it's effects. Also, one should be careful not to over incentivize ranchers towards feeding wolves, but compensate them justly.
Strictly speaking, under ideal condition wolves live longer, so an increase in population is also possible.
It made news today that a single wolf has been photographed on a road in a small town (La Ferrière) and already the mayor is taking the opportunity to ask for "regulation", claiming that sightings of the animal occur every day in his town (one might wonder why, if that's the case, a blurry photo of a single individual makes national news...).
What incentive would a rancher ever have for preventing the wolves from killing the steers? If the wolves don't kill a steer, well then there's the hassle of taking it to market and getting market price. If the wolves kill the steer, then they get market price plus 5%, and don't have to even find a buyer.
There is a serious danger in feeding wild animals and ranchers are smart enough to know it.