How Heat Kills Cells
quantamagazine.org
quantamagazine.org
Core temperature is tightly regulated, as well. It should be 37degC. Plus or minus just 2 degrees will severely impair function, plus or minus 5 degrees is reason to call 911.
Saunas and ice baths don't damage cells but actually have benefits. Don't quote me as this is a rephrase that makes it sound like bro-science, it actually activate some heat shock proteins and also leads to hormone release.
Better, sound science can be sourced from Dr. Rhonda Patrick a la Tim Ferriss podcast or Google Scholar
One can argue whether sweating in this context does or does not also carry off toxins. But in addition to its thermoregulatory role, increased circulation is one of the body's natural healing mechanisms. (Out of control increased circulation causing tissue damage is one of the reasons we ice injuries.) It delivers oxygen and nutrients to our cells. Increased circulation in the sauna may be giving the body the chance to deliver more of these things and to repair cells and organs at a higher rate than it might otherwise.
Ultimately our biological systems are simply too complex to get boiled down to any one universal bit of "common sense". I think it's laudable to try to improve ourselves, and it's true that in some cases that may require challenging oneself and/or cycles damage/repair as in working the muscles, but risks should be appreciated and approached with deliberation too. I'm certainly not trying to rag on you or anything like that, I'm just wary of this sort of thinking without caveat because I've seen it amongst my own circle used to justify some "medicines" and "treatments" and "training programs" that turned out to be quite harmful.
For me, this involves training outside in the Texas summer heat (100F+) with plain water. When I race, it is usually earlier in the day (80-90F) and I sometimes use ice socks in my jersey and ice water in my bottles to keep my core temperature down.
[1] http://blog.airiarunning.com/heat-training-does-it-boost-run...
does this give us the upper limit of the sources we can convert?
>The proteins that unravel as the temperature starts to rise turn out to be among the most vital.
I'm diverging into off-topic territory now, but I stopped reading the featured article because of the large static header div. Am I in the minority of mobile users who spends all the time in horizontal mode? It seems that probably 50% of mainstream blog or news sites I come across have some sort of obnoxious static header or footer (or worst, both!) that takes up a huge portion of the view when horizontal. Usually useless shit like a link to the main page, or their social media mention count. I take a screenshot of the worst offenders but I haven't posted them anywhere. The absolute criminal in this respect is tech crunch. You MUST orient to portrait and click the expand article button to read anything. Really unprofessional and disappointing, I avoid their links if I catch it in time.
Sorry, rant over.