Really it just feels wrong for hackernews, the site that works in elinks and only uses 7 or so optional lines of JavaScript.
Really it just feels wrong for hackernews, the site that works in elinks and only uses 7 or so optional lines of JavaScript.
I mean, if you think it's using Vue wrong then flame away, sure. But critiquing that you prefer HN's current design strikes me as a bit like going to a "TodoMVC in framework X" project and commenting that you prefer to use paper and pencil.
edit: My bad, the Live Demo link takes it to a different HN Vue page. https://vue-hn.now.sh/top
The first version of Vue HN is used in the Examples on the official Vue website: https://vuejs.org/v2/examples/hackernews.html
2 counters points:
- The low-js version is already pretty good and usable without js, why make a clone to specialize in using even less JavaScript?
- vuejs 2.x is targeting isomorphic server side rendering, so you should target your complaints to anything that should work with js disabled, but only works with js enabled.