One Day, a Machine Will Smell Whether You’re Sick
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
I would pay at least $150 for that as a hard-of-smelling person. I would have far paid more back when I was single and lonely.
https://www.raspberrypi.org/learning/fart-detector/worksheet...
Label free may not be the best phrase for what you meant though. Label free means you are looking at all biomarkers present in a sample, the primary challenge with label free is that we don't know every biomarker to look for or what every biomarker we see means.
Wash them at least twice a year :) . Bad breath I can understand, you can't tell at times but clothes? Just wash them...
No, jeans don't need to be washed after every time. Nor do sweaters or jackets. Underwear, t-shirts and socks are different. This is my rule anyway
Also, we're hiring! https://www.owlstonemedical.com/about/careers/
I'm working on molecular models for complex perfume models.
Hit me up if you have any answers please. HaoZeke@yandex.com
Given them mentions of cancer in this thread, do you already have in place a policy to avoid accidentally advertising a cancer cure in the UK (which is illegal)?
Very unlikely in the short to mid-term. While it would be possible to gather enough data to train the algorithms to detect mouth or body odours, our chemical analysers are not yet practical for hand-held use. We're working on that though.
>do you already have in place a policy to avoid accidentally advertising a cancer cure in the UK (which is illegal)?
We're developing a lung cancer screening test meant to be administered in a primary or secondary point of care, so it's not something that could be advertised as a cancer cure. Even if our test came back as positive, the patient would be referred for a CT scan or similar. The idea is to have a non-invasive test to increase the compliance rate and detect the cancer earlier. That alone increases the chance of survival quite dramatically.
Imagine a push notification to your phone that says you have a 82% chance of having hepatitis or something.
Do you think that could ever be a reality?
I mean the CMOS was a break through for image sensors.
There are air quality sensors and various kind of gas sensors.
But what sensor tech can be used to smell odor?
There are dogs that smell drugs, cancer, and what not - so "just" a sensor is needed to get the data in difital format.
[btw NYT article page crashes my mobile browser mid article, what are they doing? Their site used to be lean, now it's dog slow and something is wrong with scrolling]
There's also a technique called field-asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry, which gives you a less direct indication of the molecules you're looking at, but FAIMS can be miniaturized into a silicon chip, and that is what Owlstone has done. Here's a bit more info about FAIMS: https://www.owlstonemedical.com/science-technology/faims-tec...
edit: odours are not necessarily organic molecules
Yeah. Right. This is why Yeah. Right. This is why H2S has no smell. (in fact, some claim is has not and we smell something else).
"that are detected by the cells in our noses, and it's possible to identify them with various techniques."
Well, I think this was not the question. Yes, the mentioned start-up in this thread (owlstonemedical) uses a "Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometer", might work, but I am not too impressed by the approach. Also, would not call this a detection of "scent".
Would be more impressed if they really build an artificial nose that can smell. They eye has not receptors to detect dogs, chairs, cars but detects a spectrum. Same with the ear and actually, the same with the nose. The literature is out there.
>I work for Owlstone Medical as a software engineer, so ask me any questions and I'll try to answer as best I can.
Measure the far infrared spectrum.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-04/28/content_1127068...
Privacy concerns aside I would assume many basic medical issues could be diagnosed through those without the need for a "doctor".
Deleted comment