I would rather have a WikiLeaks that release everything that it can receives, rather than one that curates it's leaks for an agenda.
I would rather have a WikiLeaks that release everything that it can receives, rather than one that curates it's leaks for an agenda.
[1]: https://theintercept.com/2017/04/19/intercepted-podcast-juli...
Infowars says they are, "just asking the questions."
Breitbart says they are, "the last bastion of free speech."
None of the above 3 statements are true, and neither is Wikileaks statement.
You'd think evidence of corruption would be relevant and worthy of mass coverage, no matter who committed it or how it was obtained.
Besides, your entire point rests upon the incorrect assumption that the other side isn't corrupt.
no it doesn't. Anyone's corruption should be exposed for the betterment of society.
Rather, it is your argument that solely depends on the belief that others ("the other side") MUST be guilty. I understand emotions run high to match the stakes since it was the presidential election after all, but you'll note I didn't make any value judgments either way. Just because we are convinced one party is guilty doesn't mean we should ignore evidence of another's corruption out of fairness.
Our justice system cares a lot about how evidence used in a trial was obtained. If it was obtained illegally, it is often thrown out.
There is a good reason for this. I'm sure you can figure it out if you think about it. Here is a good start for some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule
There is a sense in which you can call Wikileaks neutral, sure. But that doesn't mean that they actively ensure that they are politically neutral. Quite the opposite! They are uncaring. If one side feeds Wikileaks and not the other, Wikileaks will be 100% neutral in not shifting that balance. If anti-globalist forces consistently hack globalists and not vice versa and give that info to Wikileaks, sure, Wikileaks is going to say "We just want to expose more," but the set of information being exposed is extremely non-neutral!
I would rather not have an elemental ice golem at all, I think. And if I'm going to have an elemental ice golem, I would definitely prefer one that only attacks the bad guys than one that attacks "everyone" who happens to be in the secret entrance to the bad guys' lair.