Clones of the Apple II
tedium.co
tedium.co
There were far more cloners than mentioned in the article. My second computer was a Apple][e clone shipped in parts from South East Asia mixed in a consignment from Rockwell Collins.
The cost, that magical $2000 dollar mark.
The parts were re-assembled and that's what I used from High School into my early Uni days until I started using PCs, punchcards and Vt100/Mainframe to learn programming. With a Z80 card, 80 Column card money was made off this machine spitting out resumes via a dot-matrix printer and a large supply of spooled paper. If I remember correctly the shell was a direct clone of the 2e chassis. The operating system was a direct clone. Most of my software was cloned and that's were I learned how to program 6502 machine language to interface with hardware. [0]
Reference
[0] Marvin L. De Jong, "Apple II Assembly Language" https://www.amazon.com/Marvin-L.De-Jong/e/B001H6SRHE/ref=dp_...
My first actual job was programming educational games for the platform.
Apple II+, //e clones were popular machines in Brazil, with at least a dozen local manufacturers (the US-sponsored dictatorship prohibited computer imports). They were largely superseded by MSX machines at the home and PCs at the office.
IIRC Microsoft only shut down Xbox 360 production very recently, because it was still selling well in South America. The Playstation 2 had a similarly long lifespan, I think production was just shut down a couple years ago.
the clones by cce and others were done in clean room. so apple and ibm and texas Instrument had no legal recourse. but after brazilian clones started to sell like hot cakes in europe, they convinced the usa state department to intervine and treaten to stop importing oranges from brazil. since most generals on the dictatorship had huge orange farms they caved in. and thats is the only reason why to this day that country have 80% tax on imported electronics.
the dictatorship also gave in to demands for other markets, like telecom and tv. globo (largest tv station) was started with american capital, but after seeing the profit prospects, the generals were quick to nationalize it and cut the americans investors out.
the only thing that saved brazil in terms of technology were the "micreiros". people who would buy imported computers in Paraguay and sell them illegally in brazil. Those folks deserve a national monument!
The board layout of the Apple II+ clones, with some notable exceptions (Spectrum, Magnex and one Dismac model, IIRC), were replicas of the original. The ROMs had error messages translated, but kept original lengths. Brazilian clones were never sold in Europe (or anywhere else) and were not price-competitive anywhere except in Brazil where finished computer imports were completely forbidden.
The orange tax story appears when Unitron was seeking government approval to import components to build what was a clean-room implementation of the Mac. Generals were not involved in that - it was the first democratic government after the dictatorship that made the decision. Apple demonstrated a prototype running with Apple ROMs, which were never intended to be used in the production machines, and that was why the US government got involved.
Globo was always a private editorial group. They aligned themselves with the military government and benefited from that.
http://www.brasilwire.com/the-1980s-trade-war-between-brasil...
"No, the first Macintosh clone was the Unitron Mac 512, a unauthorized copy of the 512k “Fat Mac” produced by a Brazilian company in 1986. And it was a pretty darn impressive copy. The fallout from that effort nearly helped start a trade war between Brasil and the United States; to prevent theft of Intellectual Property, Apple and other companies lobbied Congress to hike import taxes on Brazilian goods like oranges and shoes as a response."
In the lawsuit, apple claimed it was a copy, Unitron claimed it was a cleanroom effort. What was what we will never know.
and i am messing up other CPU clones that sold in europe (and eastern europe) from brazil, that ultimately died because of the repercussion of the Unitron case. Prologica and Microdigital I think.
and Globo bootstraped its television with a investment from Time-Life in 62. It is always removed from en wikipedia, but it is mentioned on pt wikipedia. But search for the date and the two companies, and you will find tons of academic articles about that.
Microdigital made Sinclair clones (ZX-81, Spectrum), one Micro Professor clone and Prologica made Sinclair (ZX-80, 81), TRS-80 (III) and Superbrain clones, but never an Apple one. I'd be surprised if any of those was exported.
Only meagre Google result for searches related to this:
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/200492012/
This is apparently a digitized archive of some 1984 issue of a newspaper from Burlington, Vermont, in which a classified AD mentions an "Apple II Clone made by VSC" which might be the same manufacturer.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=uC8EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA9&ots=IF...
InfoWorld 1983, full page ad by some company lists a VSC-002 Apple II clone.
Up until he died in 2005, my Dad still used it for printing address labels, and for running software he'd written in BASIC. I finally had to get rid of it when I moved house a few years back.
When I went to college in 1986 I bought an Amiga 1000 from Commodore with the PC Transformer 5.25 inch floppy drive. It had the C64 and Apple II emulators but for college I focused on DOS and the PC emulator.
It would have been an interesting history, if instead of cancelling the II line, Apple had kept shrinking it and reducing its price.