Depending on where you are, I think this is not entirely true. IANAL, but I think that in many/most US states, contracts with minors are not presumptively void, they are voidable at the option of the minor (or their guardian, I imagine). Of course, this is a pretty big downside for their counterparties, so it makes contracts with minors pretty unappealing, obviously.
Contracts can't be enforced against children in England. A child is someone under the age of 18.
> Besides which, is signing up for PayPal a contract in the first place?
Yes. Paypal make an offer, the customer accepts that offer. There's mutual obligation: paypal provides a service and the customer pays fees.
That free transfer system in combination with being a "safer" payment option offered by some merchants makes PayPal pretty attractive to the average customer. And -- most of the horror stories come from merchants, not customers. Even though I try to avoid PayPal on principle, it's hard for me to convince my friends to care.
It ended up being cheaper than using my bank also.
Wouldn't it be that you committed financial fraud? Paypal initially allowed you to send/receive payments purely based on the fact that you stated you were an age you were not.
The Paypal signup form does not let you signup unless the DOB given, shows you're over the age of 18.
This guy lied about his age and then had the audacity to write a blog post about how bad Paypal is.
He shows he's willing to lie and also willing to commit financial fraud (as that is what it's considered.) - I for one, am very glad someone like him HAS been banned from Paypal.
If you're knowingly lying to gain access something, you don't need a EULA/TOS to know you shouldn't be doing it.
It's an arbitrary distinction. I don't think many people would have an issue with anyone saying they were 18 to get an online account. This isn't the same as lying with the intent to cause harm.
It would have been simpler for everyone if PayPal had given him an option to agree to new TOS now they've picked the discrepancy.
Anyway, children can have bank accounts and own real estate and shares. Having a PayPal account at the age of 17 is less offensive than farting in an elevator.
Paypal can enforce the contract terms against people 18 years old or older. They can't (in england) against people aged 17 or younger.
> children can have bank accounts
Those accounts are restricted.
IE; if you're 17 and put your DOB into the Paypal signup process, it literally stops you from signing up.
This person lied to get an account.
Unless you can prove that "it literally stop[ped] you from signing up" in 2007, then you have no credibility.
I remember signing up to PayPal in 2003 at the age of 14 without lying about my age. I did a lot of the things OP did, web dev, hosting costs, etc.
These days, I only use PP (all fresh accounts, for anyone at PayPal reading this with your ban hammer out, put it away won't you?) when I have to, and even then, through gritted teeth.
All this aside, I've now sorted my personal accounts, I've had a ton of messages now from people that are closing up theirs for good, or at least restarting their accounts to protect themselves - so I'm glad I've been banned too.