I am well aware of the various ways to look at statistics. Average vs median wages, equal pay vs comparable pay, etc. However, before you get angry, please consider that the argument works the other way too. For example, the statistic that advertises that about half the managerial jobs are taken by women is heavily skewed by jobs that are managerial only in the sense that there is a managerial title such as a shift manager at McDonalds, loan officer, etc, whereas if we take executive positions the number is well below 20%. There are many ways you can manipulate the numbers to support both sides of the argument, but whichever way you spin it, can we agree on something we all know - that white guys make more than women or non-whites overall? In other words, if you don't like that I used 3 quarters in my example, would it really be much different if you had 9 dimes, or would you still be laughed out of the aforementioned McDonalds?

Of course my point was not the 75 cents to a dollar ratio. My point was, the original poster implied that they (women|brown people|whatever) rally against us (white males) because they are a bunch of whiny jealous sissies. So, as one of them, I'd simply like to state that we are not against you (in fact we like you very much!) and we are well adjusted, thank you very much. You can use belittling words such as "heartwrenching" or "inferiority complex" all you want but it doesn't make any difference. A dollar is a dollar, and a bunch of change is a bunch of change.

P.S. Not surprisingly, to support your argument, you linked to a guy who is so gender-angry that he maintains a blog whose sole topic of discussion is how men are short-changed by the modern society. Just look at his table of content: "American Women Resorting to Desperate Measures", "A Life System Support For A Penis". I mean, the guys blames women's lib for teens having oral sex for chrissakes:

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/06/08/the-result-of-womens...