a beautiful notes app (to me) would be one where you start with writing a note
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2016/10/24/distrusting-new...
https://security.googleblog.com/2016/10/distrusting-wosign-a...
Kobble is hosted on Firebase.
Anyone have a suggestion for a better cert I could get? Starcom was so nice and simple but seems like it's causing issues for users now that Mozilla and Google are going to distrust the cert.
Tracks are associated with audio and channels with video. This isn't something that should be unique or creative. The notebook/note paradigm works exceedingly well becayse everyone intuitively understands it. I spent two minutes before I just quit. its too bad, the apo seemed nice
Kobble can be used for much more than just note taking. It's meant to share meaningful content with other users. A track is like a project, and channels make it easy to share them.
The fact that you need to explain it is a good indicator that it's unnecessarily complex.
[quiver]: http://happenapps.com/#quiver
Also, check out http://standardnotes.org/
You've got a good start to something; take two steps back, consume and digest the feedback you're getting, then use it to better your approach.
First make a notes app that people love. This will be harder than you think. Once you've done that and have enthusiastic users it will be much easier to move into other areas.
Hasn't this been the Evernote Recipe For Disaster?
Better to slightly misuse/expand an existing know term like projects or notebooks to cover more than it does now, than to invent a new term that covers all the meanings that apply, but whose meaning is initially unfamiliar to people.
E.g. "my way is da best, you should do WHAT I SAY"
Though the one I listed is the first lemma.
Also, it's inconsistent. Youtube organizes channels because it is a video app and people coming from tv immediately understand. Spotify uses tracks because it is a music app and the term track has been synonomous with song since probably the first record player.
Its a good try, but just mashing up two concepts into one causes confusion
I don't manage projects with a notes app. I don't create tracks with a notes app. I don't create channels with a notes app. I don't create playlists with a notes app.
It's pretty and functional; play to your strengths instead of trying to create new brand vernacular.
model it after something in the real world before you appropriate words from another paradigm
Spotify has Playlists and Songs. Both are domain-related concepts (the domain being music).
YouTube has Videos, Playlists, and Channels, again all domain-related concepts, referring to historical domain terminology (Channel as in "your private TV channel", where you create content for others to view).
So both services use terms apt to their use.
Channels and Tracks are not concepts/terms related to note taking. Thus, the analogy to YouTube's and Spotify's use of their own terms is broken.
We have the concept of 'tags' in our app, which are used by our users to delineate anything from company departments, social groups, locations, age bands etc. - basically anything they see fit. It saves us creating a mess of drop downs to try and cater for all edge cases, and they feel the freedom to think of them however they like.
I first want to write -- directly, as a thought/task/etc comes to me, and only later to organize. And much later I'd care to share my note (if at all).
I'm sorry. I just don't know what this means. Can you show some examples?
EDIT: I tried it. Tried adding a URL, but just got errors. Filenames worked though. Now how do I share it with my mom? Does she need a github account to look at it? I don't immediately see the use of this. You may need to explain it better.
You can see the confusion, given that you described it as a "notes app" in your submission title.