https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313580454_Low-accel...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313580454_Low-accel...
The "theory behind the EM drive" [1] is completely based on classical electrodynamics and therefore it's flawed. Classical electrodynamics conserves momentum and energy. It doesn't mean that the EM drive can't work though, it just means that this theory can't work.
[1] I only found this: http://www.emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf
Is this what you refer as the "theory behind the EM Drive"?
Um. Isn't that a contradiction in terms? By definition, DM is stuff whose existence is inferred by observations that contradict what we previously presumed to know. Hence postulate the existence of DM to close the gap between what we observe and what we "know".
Is there a consensus on this interpretation v. "just adding more dark matter"?
This reminded me of https://xkcd.com/1758/