Write a second article apologizing for the first one. Don't make the first article disappear.
This is seriously bad journalism.
People make mistakes, this doesn't really bother me too much, especially since they have apologized and promised a more in-depth re-post in the future.
What does bother me is how crazy people are getting about this. I understand being a fan of something, but there's such a thing as taking it too far. Yeesh.
Engadget certainly welcomes the traffic and attention offering news bring.
And I read that article before it was taken down, it was total fluff. It shouldn't ever have been posted. They should have taken it down and left the editor's explanation in place.
But seriously, Android-fan readers need to calm the fuck down. This inconsequential editing gaffe doesn't mean Engadget hates anyone's phone, nor love anyone else's phone, or have any special conspiracy-driven agenda to hide bad press for Apple. It reveals the profound insecurity of that forum's collective mentality when they say things like that and get a lot of people agreeing.
I know the EVO has been getting socked in the press for its battery life (and these complaints are legitimate), but really it's a cool phone with a lot to offer and all signs point to the launch going very well for a Sprint phone. Re-lax.
The only thing they could have done to improve it without takedown is put a big disclaimer at the top, “Journalism is hard. Sorry about the pile of poop below. We dropped the ball on this one.”
That would be a perfectly acceptable solution ;-)
A disclaimer stating all data on the iPhone 4 is from spec-sheets would do too.
It would not be hard to make a comparison matrix between the two phones from the data that's publicly available. With the proper disclaimer, it wouldn't even be a bad article - just a very preliminary one. You don't need to refrain from reporting on an important development (Apple announcing a phone is important) when you have incomplete data - all you need is to clearly state that.
http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2355928
http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2355929
Seems like one of the better reviews I've read, mostly pointing out that which is best depends on several factors such as where you live, what kind of apps you use etc.
In reality, you can't make a good comparison between a phone that was just launched and one that hasn't been. You end-up comparing press-releases, something the tech press was never afraid to do.
The poll is back up in that article, and now the iPhone is winning..