The real question: is there anyone out there that really debates that exercising constantly = better, longer life?
The real question: is there anyone out there that really debates that exercising constantly = better, longer life?
We feel better doing this for ourselves. Some weekends we go to the gym and usually, when we do we stay longer.
I'm a believer.
Heck, I'm lucky if I can be asleep by 4:30am...
Mike Tyson was one of the best mental fighters ever.
Since you are up so early and only have 40mins from waking up to gym, mind sharing your diet too (what you eat when)?
It's been 10 years and I still have to watch my calories like a hawk if I want to stay below obese (I've quit trying for not being overweight, though that would be nice). I swim 1250 meters a day. Previously I've cycled 24 miles a day, or run 30-45 minutes a day, depending on what worked best with my work/home situation.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/sep/19/exercis...
This is the key point. Eating healthy is absolutely a good idea and helps you perform better but most people eat a lot more than they think they do.
When I started exercising I lost 50 pounds over a year and a half or so without a single change to my (absolute garbage) diet.
Saying you can work out 5x week and eat anything is idiotic, but the key to weight loss is to track your calories, not to eat healthier. You should eat healthier for other reasons.
If you eat 3,500 calories of the above every day you are probably going to gain weight. If you eat 1,400 calories a day of fast food you probably won't, but it's hard to say that the latter is healthy.
A little chocolate a couple times a week.
Was pre-diabetic and no longer am. My blood chemistry has never been better. Total cholesterol is around 120 and triglycerides are around 70. I do take a statin.
I have two doctors that support my diet. One a internist and one a cardiologist.
I get up and sit in the dark for 10 to 15 minutes. I drink two cups of mild coffee. Some morning eat 1/2 oz almonds before going to the gym. Some mornings I eat nothing.
Breakfast is usually two scrambled eggs with some meat (can be chicken, salmon, beef, turkey). Small amount of cheese. Some mornings egg and a half (the whites of one.).
https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&q=egg+cholesterol&...
High cholesterol foods contributing to high cholesterol is another one of those myths that continue to linger.
Modern research is showing that high cholesterol folk are high because their bodies are producing high amounts of cholesterol, not because they are consuming high amounts of cholesterol.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3096178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4635278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25977402
You probably should take ubiquinol every day while you're on those things
This is an odd one to me. I'm usually skeptical about claims like those made by the low-carb people...
...but I've tried it, and have excellent results. Anecdata is abundant. I know the science is ambiguous, but I'm a believer.
Grats on the new you.
The problem with carbs isn't that they are necessarily bad, but that the bulk of easily available food is mostly non-fibrous processed carbs, which leads to overeating, reduced nutrient density and less appetite satiety which makes overeating very easy.
Walk to any grocery store and most of any boxed food provide energy as carbs. At 2000 calories a day, that's a ~500g (4cal/g) budget for protein & carbs. 4x nutter butter packages burns through 1k+ calories, which I've seen family member teenagers do while junk fooding it up, then eating multiple 1k+ calorie meals. There's a ridiculous amount of inadvertent overeating that is occurring with the types of convenience foods available today.
Most naturally occurring carbs (rice, fruit, wheat, quinoa) are generally loaded up with fiber which satiate appetite, reduce insulin/sugar spikes, etc. Most people don't eat raw or minimally processed carbs through. It's generally consumed as soda, bread, chips/snacks, etc, + whichever meal is being consumed that day.
The body's metabolic process is pretty straightforward. Sugar is stored as glycogen in muscles & liver. Fat/Lipids are stored as fat in the presence of insulin. Protein is used for tissue regeneration and also converted into sugar through gluconeogenesis. Caloric excess means extraneous fat is stored, with an additional burden placed on the heart to support the additional blood flow to having more "body" (more capillaries), while caloric deficit leads to the consumption of the fat reserves.
People would be healthier in general by merely consuming higher nutrient density foods and staying at a proper caloric maintenance. Weighing food out for a week usually opens people eyes to the portions they are consuming. A serving of cereal seems okay at 120 calories, but in reality, a "bowl" is like 3-4 servings when actually measured out.
I do nap. Hey I'm 63. I have an office with a door at work and I take a power nap 4 out of 5 days. I love a power nap. Usually 12 to 18 minutes or so.
I've been up all night tonight testing 3 server replacements from home. So no exercise today. Drinking a glass of wine as I wind down from the testing.
That's awesome progress!
The real question is how do you get people of their ass and start exercising?
This includes me, I feel much better on days I make it to the gym.
I think as technology people, we often grew up missing the athletic / team / social aspect associated with sports, which helps make it actually desirable to keep as a lifestyle activity. I now have a good group of friends from this one hobby (where before, I'd have been more likely to just have video game buddies, drinkimh buddies, etc).
You don't. You wait for them until they decide and act on their decision.
Decisions are backed by the environment (in a broad sense), so it's important to understand (for the sake of effectiveness) which changes can be done to the environment, to stimulate taking such decision[s].
What I was trying to say is: I don't give a flying raccoon if people want to exercise or not.
So yeah. No strategising from me.
* Have a gym close to work (i.e. 5 minute walk or less) and a corporate culture that lets you take 45-60 minute lunch breaks. Bonus - I find this makes my afternoons much more productive.
* Live 6+ cycle-able miles from work and ideally have a shower at work
* Be a student with a gym near your classes and an hour or two to kill between them
When one of these things is true I always manage to get a decent routine going. Without that I have always failed. Moving away from southern California to a place where I walk and cycle everywhere has helped.
They're all adults, in this age of information they all the facts available for such decision.
Sometimes there are obvious ways to do this--check here if you don't want to be an organ donor, click this link if you don't want half this raise/starting salary to automatically go into your 401k--and sometimes it's a lot trickier, but it still seems worth investigating in those cases.
It's not obvious how to make exercising opt-out, but I'm skeptical of any claims that we can't non-coercively change behavior until we investigate it a lot and fail consistently.
Some companies provide on-site gyms. Some have secure bike parking + showers. Some provide free or subsidized membership to nearby gyms (if simply subsidized, it could be made opt-out). Even something as simple as providing standing desks could make a difference.
Sure, they're all adults, but their behavior is still shaped more by culture and environment than thoughtful, conscious decisions. Why do I give the government an interest-free loan instead of minimizing my withholding and put it into an interest-bearing account? I know I have the fiscal discipline to benefit from this, but it's weird and not default, so I don't.
Trivial inconveniences are incredibly effective in changing behaviors. In many cases, we can adjust those inconveniences.
This is in Denmark, btw, probably one of the easiest countries to bike in.
I really don't know how to get people to start exercising.
The point is - should we? Why waste all those resources in subtly coercing, conditioning and deceiving responsible, adult people into wanting to have better lives? The situation will self-correct in a few decades all by itself, and there is too many of us on this planet anyway.
I have a colleague at work who is younger than me, almost morbidly obese. He is fully aware of it, he even cracks jokes about it. He is interested in reading all the theory in the world about anatomy, digestion, dieting, excercise, even chemistry, but he is too weak-willed to actually hop on that bike (which he bought last year, yet to my knowledge never used so far), or go for a walk. But he's already finished the new Mass Effect game and is up to speed with all the TV series out there. Every now and then, I suggest that he joins us when we go out on light bike trip, or swimming in nearby lake in summer, but he always makes one excuse or another.
Another colleague of mine is slightly older, and used to be almost as obese as the first one. About a year ago, he decided to start cycling to work, and also do some cycling in his free time. He changed a lot, is much more lean (or rather less "unlean", he still has ways to go), and by his own words, feels much better.
Both of them have made their choice, and are making it over and over again.
That said, I'm all for teaching kids good habits, they do not know any better, and it is our generation's task to impart wisdom (or something we consider wisdom, anyway) to the next one.
Leave your work access card (or some other daily essential) in a locker overnight if they'll let you, so you have to go to the gym in the morning no matter what.
Take pre-workout in a morning or before you leave work so you have too much energy to _not_ go to the gym.
You only need to bootstrap the habit. Then it becomes natural.
The real question is: how much better, how much longer? A priori any real-valued metric has a 50% chance of being net positive, but that doesn't mean the effect will be large enough to matter.
If NYT is paywalled: http://wncn.com/2017/04/17/dr-campbell-can-1-hour-of-running...