That book is probably the reason I treated learning as a learnable skill rather than an innate ability.
That book is probably the reason I treated learning as a learnable skill rather than an innate ability.
I do not mean to start a tangential flamewar, but the ability to accept and be comfortable with not knowing, while at the same time believing that the unknown is not unknowable, is something a certain kind of religious worldview precludes. This is one thing which I realised quite early on that my parents didn't share my beliefs on: for them, there's some underlying agent that chooses what happens in situations that we call random or do not understand:
"I don't know why this happens, but there's no reason why we never should/it's not computable/etc."
"Ah, child, it's time to accept things as they are. When I do not understand, I say God's causing it to happen."
It's a confusing mixture of the different positions one can take on determinism coupled with a sort of complacence I find remarkable.