The End of Men
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
The article goes on to mention the working class but there, you still need men. We all know of feminists talking about "firefighter" and "chairperson" but no-one seems to mind the term "garbageman". Cherrypicking a subset of the most desirable jobs is not a sustainable situation going forwards. How many lawyers do we really need?
They boasted at the time that they were an equal-opportunity employer, and that they had as many women employed as they had men.
Yet, most of the engineers and maintenance were men, while women were mostly administrative staff and Q.A. (all the quality people were women, and they even explained that decision in that they have much higher attention to detail).
Men enjoy winning and competition to a much greater degree than women do. So long as this economy is capitalist, that alone will ensure that the best men are always at the top.
The problem is that men are also more likely to be at the bottom, and this is more evident during economic downturns.
It's a given that women, occupying the middle in greater numbers will come out ahead overall, but that's hardly the death of men. What it is though is more of a return to "normal", where a few alpha males dominate the females - who basically do everything else - and the remaining males occupy outcast roles.
We are now at the inflection point and from now on it is downhill for men.