How does this even matter or is relevant at all? I'm confused it received upvotes. Am I missing something?
-or-
The why the customer believes it to be a bug can be more important than the bug's description.
Hey, we've got company: in the MS blog's comments, there's a fellow who archly informs the peasants that "I usually archive & star (bookmark) articles that have an amazingly interesting or peculiar technical aspects. With this one, I’ll gladly make an exception."
Dammit, Raymond Chen is out of pocket for a refund on that guy's subscription.
?!? That sounded like a positive review from somebody who liked the article. He says it's neither amazingly interesting nor technical, but still good enough to bookmark.
- LOTR
Bonus points that it was written by Raymond Chen, I am a longtime fan of his writing.