What city is the microbrew capital of the US?
pudding.cool
pudding.cool
Unpopular opinion: I wish the US did more wine though. Beer is great when it's hot and sunny out, but when it's cold/rainy/snowy out, I'll take wine or bourbon or a cocktail or something.
The US is the 4th largest wine producing country in the world. To be sure a significant portion of that is low quality wine made with grapes from California's Central Valley. But the US is a big wine producer across a wide spectrum of quality and cost points.
Wine production isn't really as widespread as beer in the US but that's partly a function of the climates where grapes grow well (and economically relative to their quality). Add in fruit wines and things are a bit more widespread.
I used to like to take friends on a tour of the agricultural high school where my mother in law worked, and they produced some pretty good wine.
One flaw I will take issue with in the 'microbrew capital' list is that it's somewhat irrelevant when you take into account distribution. Hill Farmstead and The Alchemist will make anyone's top ten yet they are not in catchment for Burlington VT.
I'm also truly surprised not to see Boston show up anywhere on this list no matter how I tweak the inputs. There are multiple dozens of breweries within the metro area.
Without question, Portland ME is a mecca. But MA & VT cities don't seem to make the cut while clearly over representing in the 'top' lists?
I'll take this list with a pinch of Irish Moss to damp it down a little.
Here's one of the more compelling brewery reports I've seen recently
http://flowingdata.com/2015/10/26/top-brewery-road-trip-rout...
I am not sure how the city selection works. Tree House is more than 50 miles from Boston, so it doesn't get included. But if you move the selector to 1+ breweries and 50 miles, then Treehouse shows up, under Chicopee, MA. Which is an interesting choice, because Treehouse is less than 50 miles from Worcester, which is also less than 50 miles from Trillium (although barely), which would certainly show up.
So, maybe there are some details around the "grouping" that aren't clear. Maybe the brewery gets "pinned" to the closest city with more than 40K people?
it's also quite unclear how he used the Ratebeer data. "Data from RateBeer. Only breweries with 3+ beers that were reviewed 10+ times and 50+ total reviews were included. Restricted each brewery to its top 10 beers by review count (which accounted for greater than 90% of all reviews)."
And yet Santa Rosa, his primary example, lists the breweries Bear Republic Cooperage Fogbelt Henhouse Moonlight
...but not Russian River?! It's pretty obvious that Russian River is better rated than Bear Republic, especially by his extended criteria.
So, yeah, I guess I'd like to see his data and code.
Minneapolis is a great comparison, lots of breweries and tap rooms relatively speaking vs. Boston.
Why, clearly it's [my city].
None of the above are actually in Phoenix (Tempe and Chandler mostly) so you may be correct :).
For example, my beer taste developed while I lived in Michigan. The craft scene is more spread out there, but there is a ton of high quality IPAs, Stouts and Porters being brewed in the metro Detroit area.
Now I live in Austin, and the beer here is crap in those categories, but stronger in the Pilsners and Pale Ales. When people down here rate breweries, it is usually much more focused on those categories, thus putting Austin at #13, even though it is trash compared to a Dark Horse, or a Dragonmead, in the "harder to do right" categories. It's just that they don't know any better.
EDIT: But aside from that the presentation was nice, and well executed
EDIT 2: "Pale Ales"
The "weighted blend" of "ratings" might be more accurately portrayed as "Ratings" instead of "Quality."
At the same time, I've seen a few of these small places close up shop. In one case it was a lease dispute with the landlord and they simply couldn't afford to open up again in a new place. It's a tough business for sure and many of these breweries certainly seem to be a labor of love, profitable perhaps, but I think they're in it for the brewing.
If you are in town, go to 30th street in North Park and you can walk between something like 10 breweries / tasting rooms, not even including beer bars. It's ridiculous.
Also, Oceanside is closer to SD than many places that are in SD county. (Same could be argued for SF and Santa Rosa)
Portland, ME Boulder, CO Asheville, NC
What a goofy opening! Three of the breweries listed for New York are in Brooklyn and the other two aren't in New York City at all (which is just to say that even if you didn't realize Brooklyn is New York City, its breweries would still have been included because of proximity).
They probably should have been more interested in figuring out why Brooklyn didn't end up on a list that considered 800+ U.S. cities :)
If you ever find yourself here in Loveland be sure to checkout Grimm Bros: http://grimmbrosbrewhouse.com/
I know this isn't a completely accurate list, but:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_breweries_in_Ohio#Nort...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_breweries_in_Pennsylva...
In general, imprecision in the definitions and data is what keeps this debate alive over what the greatest city is for beer. Makes for entertaining internet argument fodder!
But they really aren't. GR doesn't even rank in the top 20, in any of the metrics listed.
https://www.ratebeer.com/p/founders-brewing-company-grand-ra...
Bottle House Brew Kettle Brick and Barrel Buckeye Cornerstone Fat Heads Forest City Goldhorn Great Lakes Hansa Market Garden Masthead Nano Platform Portside Sibling Revelry Terrestrial
I like Sacramento's stuff.
They also don't note the brands with East Coast production there like, say, Sierra Nevada and Oscar Blues, which would be hard to argue don't count as breweries.
Anyway, Santa Rosa is so small, it could really be the winner. But per capita, it would be hard to imagine anywhere else besides Asheville would be the spot.