Technology is amazing and moving rapidly, and if we can't take out five minutes to revel in an achievement like this, I don't know what the point is.
Technology is amazing and moving rapidly, and if we can't take out five minutes to revel in an achievement like this, I don't know what the point is.
(I'll try it under Windows when I get home, and then maybe feel more celebratory.)
The interface is better than the desktop app, but that is just cursory from material design. I cannot tell if functionality has been lost quite yet---which is a common problem with redesigns. According to settings, KML support in this redesign is experimental.
I looked at it and have no idea why it took that long to load or how it was significantly different from either Earth or Maps.
E: It also runs a lot more choppy than the desktop version.
What achievement are we revelling in? That they've managed to replicate something a desktop app could already do in javascript?
Other than that, the web version has some new features, possibilities etc., compared to the old desktop version. But that's more debatable perhaps.
The new one is marketed like the plague of interpretive centers that turn free discovery into a linear factory commodity experience of being told what is important, what to look at, and what facts to regurgitate on command.
I suspect the new one will be very popular for school teachers.