Well, you're right to criticize the author's post, at least.
Newer research shows that, for easy tasks, the better you are at it, the most likely you are to accurately assess your abilities. For hard tasks, though, it is the least talented who are best able to assess their level of skill.
This conflicts with the original Dunning-Kruger hypothesis which said that the most talented generally would be more accurate overall.
So the example of thinking you're some kind of Street Fighter badass because you're undefeated in your neighborhood is a highly likely scenario, but it's not the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Even less appropriate an example of the Dunning-Kruger effect would be a prize-winning journalist (the author) making some slight errors in a blog post, which is what you claim in your last sentence.
Hypothetically, though, an internet commenter who thinks he is a psychology expert but then goes to make an even worse mistake in his attempt to pedantically correct the original author, might be.