Fedora's strong point is that packages are pretty new (not quite Arch). This is also its weak point. The idea that it's stable is just funny. It also doesn't even pretend to support upgrades. If you want stable, try CentOS or Debian Stable.
> It also doesn't even pretend to support upgrades
Around 2011-2013, I used on my work(office) machines Ubuntu while I continued to have Fedora on my laptop.
Fedora not only did it have more recent packages, it was so much more stable than ubuntu that it was incomparable.
In general I find Ubuntu as the most unstable distro one could use :/
Also, dist upgrades are a bit unnecessary when you can have your /home in a separate partition and do a fresh install of the newer Fedora version in a couple of minutes.
This was certainly true in the past but hasn't really been the case for the last couple of years.