I assume it serves a propaganda purpose.
They view popular suppport of military actions as an important strategic objective because they require congressional support for their procurement budgets, and executive support (capitulation to?) for their planned operations. War is political and they do this kind of thing to manage the politics of war.
The immediate followup question then becomes: why does the Pentagon view bragging about weapons as effective for gathering political support for their wars?
I can't say that I have a clear notion of why they believe this. Perhaps because it plays to the pornographic nature of the mainstream media in the U.S., which enthusiastically embraces spectacles of violence. Perhaps because they are correct to believe that a majority of Americans are stimulated by war porn. The media certainly believes that. They get the ratings. Or perhaps you're right and its less sophisticated than I am imagining. Maybe the Pentagon really does think it's a kind of accomplishment worth bragging about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWejiXvd-P8
Bright lights, big noises, it plays well to some of his electorate.
Would you rather it was done in complete secrecy? The openness of our military is one of the great strengths of American democracy.
lmao if you believe that's true.
There's ZERO chance that the U.S. would tolerate collateral damage on it's own citizens in the name of getting ISIS, so why accept the possibility of non-American causalities?
Furthermore they are great scapegoat for an executive government power grab and building a surveillance state.
It doesn't hurt that prolonged military engagements do wonders for the profits of the military-industrial complex either.