Mark Russinovich:The Case of the Random IE Crash
blogs.technet.com
blogs.technet.com
So why would a browser toolbar component become part of a video-card/temperature tool bundle? Poor DLL tracking on the tool developer's part?
They usually have opt-outs, but the shadier ones do not - and you can legitimately click "next-next-next" and don't read about them and uncheck the button that installs it - that's what they're counting on.
If someone like Russinovich didn't see it, it was probably not opt-out.
Edit: here's some relevant info
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090518120035AA...
Google purportedly pays U$ 2 per install, I guess Yahoo! does the same
This stuff doesn't stop until people know what's installed, why, and what resources are being used.
What I don't understand is why he didn't notice the toolbar itself, since he was actively using the browser when it crashed. Perhaps it was installed, but instructed to hide itself? (As opposed to being installed & disabled.)
But if ever there was a blog post that explained why I don't use windows this was it!
You have some random out of date software application installed on your machine and don't even know it? And you are a highly technical person?
I can't even imagine what it's like for a non technical person.
It has a unified place where programs can list themself, but the actual un-installation is up to the program. And it has no unified method of checking if programs are up to date.
However, for various reasons – a mix of cultural and economic I suspect – ridiculous hidden installations and other software showing a coldly calculated contempt for the user are a fact of life while using Windows, and are very rare indeed on other platforms.