Why you should become an open source sustainer
opensource.com
opensource.com
A great example is melpa and marmalade for emacs. The difference between having a package manager and not having a package manager has transformed the open source project but all they are doing is mirroring a bunch of elisp.
Sometimes just providing the infrastructure to make a project available is the only reason why the project is popular. npm anyone?
someone else = contributors
everyone who is not = mainly corporations
Linux Torwalds and linux maintenners are paid - which is a good thing btwm
This is my gut feeling too.
Most open source people are okay with using a few (or more) proprietary software (Binary blobs in kernel?). They don't have any strong motive (there are not ethics or moral) to keep everything "open source" as do the free software people.