Having something that outlines the key features and components and which ignores the important but complicated edge cases assists in keeping the attention focused.
Now if there are annotation within the source code, that would be truely incredible.
Having something that outlines the key features and components and which ignores the important but complicated edge cases assists in keeping the attention focused.
Now if there are annotation within the source code, that would be truely incredible.
http://aosabook.org/en/index.html
(The books are CC and free to read on-line :))
I'm just through the few first chapters of the first book, and I must say it's absolutely amazing. Each chapter gives some understanding of the thought process people designing (and iterating on) a known open-source project had.
Yes. This is exactly the kind of thing I was once looking for, only I didn't know how best to phrase at the time. Think I've since found some of the details I needed then, but will look into these nonetheless and see what I missed, if anything.
Thanks!
Corrode is absolutely incredible. This file is literate Haskell, which means there's more documentation than code (I guess), and it transforms C into Rust.
That's the intent, but to the compiler, the meaning of literate Haskell is that comments are the default, and only lines starting with > contain code
By the way, is there are similar resource for building your own relational SQL-based database?
It is Windows specific but very informative.
As long as the first commit isn't something like 'import to git' or 'add the code' (which seem to be tragically frequent) I find VCS a huge help here. The problem is that large OSS applications are (tautalogically) large. VCS allow cutting it back, and showing the evolution.