I love how you believe that most reviewers have time to conduct a thorough review for a journal, most of the time.
As opposed to something much closer to "LGTM!" With some "but be sure to cite my vaguely-relevant work in Foo et al, 1952".
As opposed to something much closer to "LGTM!" With some "but be sure to cite my vaguely-relevant work in Foo et al, 1952".
Your objection is to a position I never took -- in fact I suggested the opposite. The depth of a review is gauged by its length, not its accuracy or objectivity.