More specifically, their content tends to be (a) reprints of Stratfor, Bloomberg or Reuters articles (just read the original), (b) bad financial market predictions and (c) unsourced, unambiguous and untrue rubbish.

[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking...

PCR thinks Charlie Hebdo was an American initiated false flag.

Zero Hedge are okay when they're talking some financial subjects, but go off the rails in anything political related. That comment section is a cesspool.

Why is that you think a huge organization of professional journalists (a profession with an independent ethics code and enforcing body) is easier to "buy out" than a handful of white dudes blogging on the internet?