I'd just like to register my opinion that I don't see Washington Post is an objective, nor even a trustworthy source at this point. When they print something it's often worth looking deeper into I believe.
So you've never actually been to Breitbart then? I checked it regularly before the 2016 elections and, in those days, it certainly earned its nickname "stormfront lite." They've toned it down since the additional scrutiny and subsequent mainstreaming of the Trump era, but WaPo has never been and will never even come close to Breitbart. Also Breitbart is an overt propaganda outlet. WaPo may seem biased, but it certainly does not engage propaganda on the same level as Breitbart.
WaPo has never been and will never even come close to Breitbart.
Meanwhile, if you see any factual errors on Breitbart, by all means post them.
I liked this one:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/breitbart-issues-best-co...
That's because you probably believe that the Illuminati or clockwork elves are real.
Yours is the kind of negative, noncontributory comment I would'nt be surprised to see dang flag.
Your comment consists entirely of conspiracy theories and personal attacks.