> More importantly, it seems you don't even care about coherency. It looks like that to you, if something "feels bad" then it is bad.
I don't understand where this is coming from. Please explain what you mean, and why you think that.
> but I also can see you have not even bothered to explain your objections to them.
My objection was that the parent post claimed the quote was "word salad" and I claim it is not, because the quote obviously has a message and it is not difficult to figure out what it is.
If you meant that I didn't bother explaining the message, well then here is how I interpret the quote:
>Reputation is worth more than gold. Niggers have a reputation -- no fathers.
He's talking about stereotypes here, and how there is a stereotype that many black men abandon their children/family.
> Irish have a reputation. Germans have a reputation.
Again referencing stereotypes.
> Attacker has the advantage.
Guy who hits first usually wins the fight.
> Jews have a reputation. God said the French once stood for character. (Code of Chivalry) Ironic.
Again, stereotypes. He is obviously referencing WW2 in this context and talking about how the French were easily defeated by the Germans.
> I guess Jews did, too. Woah! God is boss. Too bad the Jews were cowards and didn't assassinate NAZI's.
I'm guessing here he is saying the Jews were God's chosen people, but they didn't live up to that an let the Germans almost destroy them.
So yeah, most people don't talk like this guy in normal conversation, but it is pretty clear to me that he is talking about stereotypes and sticking up for yourself. I might not get the finer details he is trying to communicate, but even so it is far from unintelligible.