VC investments in education
learnboost.com
learnboost.com
I agree that education has been an under-invested in industry but question as to whether the amounts are low as are stated in the article.
That's about $100MM in the last six months alone and this is an industry where there are a number of fundings that never get announced. Again, I agree with your main premise, just not sure the data is as dire as you suggest.
Stepping back, your last 6 months point is why I wrote the article -- you can see that VC investments are accelerating, and it's only going to get better for guys like you and me with education startups.
That drives part of the "around $100 mln a year over the last 5 years" point too, since it's safe to assume that Education is somewhere under that amount. Though to be fair, disagreeing about whether it's an average of $150 mln or $100 mln over the past 5 years does get away from the larger point, which I think we agree on.
Some more facts:
- Over the past three years there have been 165 private equity backed transactions within the education sector. - Aggregate deal value of these investments based on data compiled by Berkery Noyes is in excess of $35 billion. - Education was the source of 4 IPO's in the last 18 months
Also, regarding your point about strong cash flows and large profit margins not existing in education: that is a myth.
Two points from that same presentation:
- Across various education sectors EBIT margin ranges from 15%-40%. - Negative working capital: many K-12 models for content and technology receive cash first and are transitioning to SaaS and subscription based, recurring revenue content models
The following comment doesn't apply to any VCs y'all may be friends with: the key skill for maximizing a VC firm's income is to maximize their assets under management, and that makes investments a marketing decision which have second order consequences on capital returns.
Cleantech is sexy and will attract dollars. Education is not sexy. Given the choice between a sexy field with N% expected returns and an unsexy field with N+3% returns, a rational VC would back sexy almost every time.
This should not come as a surprise to anyone who has studied the mutual fund industry, which is also perpetually chasing the new hotness (which juices inflow) at the expense of returns for the owners.
Take BP as a good example of this. It's a major oil company trading at a P/E under 6. If they made a catastrophically huge one-time payment of $30 billion to settle the Deepwater Horizons case, they'd still be worth ~50% more than their current price. But who wants to say that they profited from environmental destruction? Better to invest in Google--you get a stake in the business, but you also get a stake in the smugness.
I don't know how the hell I'm going to get them to pay for mine. They will pay for me to tutor them, though, so I know there is a way.
I believe you are correct, however, in that things will shift when it is "anonymous" and online. Kind of like selling childrens' toys: the kids have to like it, but the parents have to be willing to pay as well.
100+ VCs in this event.