What a bunch of sell-out traitors.
Is there no party that values privacy, individual liberty, or the constitution?
I thought these "Senators" took an oath to protect the constitution. From the way they vote, it seems they never even read it!
Is there no party that values privacy, individual liberty, or the constitution?
I thought these "Senators" took an oath to protect the constitution. From the way they vote, it seems they never even read it!
(2) Oddly silent were folks like Google, Microsoft, etc. I fully expect to have to pay for privacy, or to have to choose whom I trust with my data: Comcast or Google.
Its a shitty time for privacy, period.
Here's the text of the bill (it's pretty short): https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-joint-re...
It looks like all this does is undo an FCC rule from Dec 2, 2016. My understanding is that if this passes, our internet privacy will be the same as it was on Dec 1, 2016.
Am I wrong? Why is this so bad?
No element of that rule change, implemented weeks after the election, could possibly have taken effect before next December. (There are complex notification requirements that could push parts of it out even longer).
Prior to August 2016, the FTC regulated all aspects of consumer protections. Unfortunately, the FTC has a specific call-out ceding authority to the FCC for certain parts of the regulation of 'common carriers', which ISPs fell into.
AT&T sued and said that the FTC carve-out for common carriers means that the FTC can't regulate any part of their business, not even consumer protections like data privacy. In August, the US Court of Appeals ruled in favor of AT&T, which meant that the FCC would have to enact new rules and would have responsibility for consumer protection with regards to common carriers.
The FCC passed consumer protection rules in October (which came into force in December). The FCC has authority on rulemaking unless there's an explicit congressional action saying otherwise. So along comes the new Republican Senate and they pass this bill to nullify the FCC rules. It's written ambigiously enough that you'll likely need another act of congress to undo it, which would require a Democratic congress / senate / President.
In summary: before August, the FTC protected your data. Since last winter, the FCC was protecting it. If this passes, nobody will be protecting it.
I read into it a bit more. The original FTC suit was brought against AT&T in 2014, but in 2015 the FCC reclassified ISPs as common carriers under Title II. So the 9th Circuit's August ruling just reflected that reclassification by the FCC.
The FCC's new consumer protection rules from last year are much harsher for ISPs than the previous FTC rules, so now there is a two-tiered system of data protection.
Senator Flake suggested in the WSJ that he wants the FCC to come up with consumer protection rules for ISPs that use the FTC's framework. (Source: https://archive.is/hKz0a)
To protect consumers from these harmful new regulations, I will soon introduce a resolution under the Congressional Review Act to repeal the FCC’s flawed privacy rules. While the resolution would eliminate those rules, it would not change the current statutory classification of broadband service or bring ISPs back under FTC jurisdiction. Instead, the resolution would scrap the FCC’s newly imposed privacy rules in the hope that it would follow the FTC’s successful sensitivity-based framework.
This seems pretty reasonable, but we still need Congress or the FCC to come up with another system that will fill the regulatory gap left by the 2015 rule change.
"The Senate" didn't vote for this. The Republicans did.
Scroll down to "Grouped by Vote Position".
EDIT: Better link
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_...
Grouped By Vote Position is most useful for this question, they don't offer a by-party grouping but it's pretty easy to scan all 50 YEAs and see every one is followed by an "R." All the NAYs are from Democrats or independents. Senator Isakson (R) didn't vote because he's recovering from surgery, I don't know why Rand Paul (R) didn't vote.
[0] https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-joint-re...
The democratic party is greedy and selfish, but their positions on many issues are far less anti-human.
As far as corporations? Not unconstitutional, but I don't think passing laws in the interest of the People's privacy against corporations would be unconstitutional either, so if our government had our best interests in mind, then they'd pass those laws instead of repealing them.
That is still a debatable issue though. I completely agree with you, but there are possible world views in which one might think allowing ISPs to sell your viewing data will provide a better product to the end user. Of course this assumes trust that these corporations will act ethically with your data (i.e. anonymize the data before selling and not allowing any leaks of non-anonymised data). That's a dream world to me, but a lot of people seem to be living in dream worlds to me these days.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland