FedEx will give you $5 to reinstall Flash
theverge.com
theverge.com
That was one of those threads which just gets opaquely disappeared off the front page.
Which is something I've been noticing happening a lot lately. Really big turnoff from participating in this site.
The ranking algo might be a bit more sophisticated.
The problem is the opaqueness of it
Which leaves a lot of room for the appearance of capriciousness, and sometimes even (though not so much in this case, this is not nearly that consequential a story) malice.
http://sangaline.com/post/the-stories-that-hacker-news-remov...
Cost to migrate internal apps to HTML5 = $$$$$$
Cost to bribe users to use an outdated, security nightmare = $$$
Come on fedex... this is next level stupidity!
Literally ;)
That said, whoever is in charge of development and I suppose FedEx bosses, too, should've seen this coming a mile away. They don't really have an excuse for not using HTML5 now.
The real customers, though, are the businesses that ship hundreds of products. $5 is irrelevant.
It actually irks me a bit about Chrome/Firefox. I understand they want to kill these addons. But I still unfortunately am forced to use sites that require Java and/or Flash. I'm just grateful MS still has the older version of IE available in Win10 so I can get these important things done.
In a past life, I had to keep two different browser installs, each with a different JVM version in obsolete browsers, aside from my "real" browser to deal with crap like that.
That said, Java applets are effectively dead, so government services now require installing and running separate program which listens at localhost for connections from browser. Honestly, it doesn't look like a big win for me, more like a big loose, from a security point. But here we go.
This sounds crazy smart. Why don't western countries do this? You could even put the fingerprint in the barcode of your driver's license.
Having said that, a better implementation would be pretty awesome.
And, yes, those certificates are unrelated, AFAIK.
It's a total nightmare because most of it is abandonware or is still for sale but unmaintained!
I've been through multiple attempts at doing it in an enterprise, one in January this year, and it always ends with the determination that Java applets are critical to websites used by the business and not going anywhere. Healthcare portals are a big offender.
I would rather know where flash beings and ends and have to jump through hoops. Actually I would prefer it never run at all ever. Flash not run is "right".
There have been too many security flaws where Flash would allow remote execution of arbitrary code, and that eventually means viruses. If my family gets a virus, then I am on the hook for it.
I reckon, can they be held liable if for example, someone installed Flash and the machine got hacked or infected? It was their recommendation in the first place?