The EFF chose a very bad / misleading title compared to what the article is actually about. A better one would be:
> Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Patent-Holders Can Control What You Do With Your Stuff
or something like that.
> Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Patent-Holders Can Control What You Do With Your Stuff
or something like that.
"Control what you do with your stuff" sounds like the concept of ownership.
Yes patents do other things but according to Lexmark their patent means you don't get to do the things you traditionally get to do with the printer you bought.