Hacker News Reader

> there's a lot of this higher level stuff in a supposably lower level language

I feel like you're suggesting that "high level stuff" is bad because it's "high level stuff."

In my opinion, the goal of low level languages is to operate under certain constraints. If you can operate under those constraints and still include "high level stuff," then you should.

You seem to be conflating capability and abstraction. Rust has low-level access to hardware and execution but provides a high level of abstraction.

In what way are these tools not also useful in Rust? Why can't we have both?