If Haskell didn't exist and had only been launched a few years ago alongside Go, what would the status of its tooling be today? That would be a fairer comparison.
Obviously one can't measure it objectively, but you do have a comparable case with Elixir, I believe. And it's clear that Go surpasses Elixir in traction.
So let's not discredit the merits of Go in such a long time. It definitely has more happening for it now than Haskell or Elixir.
The author wasn't accusing the creators of Go of being incompetents and unable to produce good tools. All was said is that currently, the tooling is not as good as Haskell's. That Go is a newer language is not a valid argument for rebutting that claim - it's only an explanation for it.