Are we still talking about this?
alexisohanian.com
alexisohanian.com
"Michael, just because you put a question mark after things, doesn't make them evidence to support your headline of 'Guy Who Copied Digg Slams Digg For Copying Twitter.'"
That might be because I find the rhetorical question incredibly annoying outside of a Socratic setting.
On a different note, I'm disappointed that Arrington would fuel this little drama production, but of course, that is his MO.
But really, we're all standing on the shoulders of giants. It's cliche for a good reason (though the English teacher in my brain is yelling at me for using one).
But our spartan designs did look similar, which I suspect is what made the connection.
(These days it's something of a dive bar, with only old regulars left and a lot of miscellaneous discussion.)
I respect that a ton.
I just wish I could get the TC Comments to work for me (why aren't they using disqus?) so I could chime in there...
(For what it's worth, I agree with you and my blog post would have been a lot meaner. :-) )
Since they say they didn't consciously copy Digg I take them at their word. I doubt they'd lie about it. I wouldn't be surprised if they're misremembering though. People are always teaching me things I taught them a week earlier. Memory is faulty and that was probably an especially stressful time for them.
We ended up considering a number of other names once we got to YC (PG wasn't a fan of reddit) but I persisted and I think Steve just realized he had better things to do.
I've got the email I sent to Steve about digg (subject line: READ THIS on 7/11/05 at 11:48pm (we launched reddit on 6/23/05).
I'm not lying or misremembering, which is what motivated me to respond.
http://alexisohanian.com/are-we-still-talking-about-this-res...
With so much good involved, I don't see why there's any reason to get so bent out of shape.