> hard to prove now ... But they're real deaths of real people.
That's a contradiction in my books. I don't want to get into a metaphysical discussion of what "real" is, but I challenge you to say that things that may not happen are real. Example: Landing humans on Mars is not real.
> There's going to be a year when self-driving cars become ubiquitous and deaths from cars drop to almost zero.
Yes. I do agree with this.
> and preventing Uber from moving forward hurts the agenda.
This is not fact. I could argue that the greatest barrier to self-driving cars reducing vehicle deaths to 0 is legislation. I could then argue that the most harmful thing to pass that legislation is early, highly publicized failures of that technology. Finally, I would argue that of all the tech companies in a position to implement said technology, Uber is the MOST likely to push it too fast and cause a highly public, negative event (given their current cloud of doom). Therefore, I conclude that the most important thing to save lives is prevent Uber from implementing that technology.
But it's all moot because none of that is real. Just like your assertion.