even if the case is dismissed, your reputation is already in ruin if people just suppose you had child pornography.
For all of this, he won't even receive an apology, much less any compensation from the government. True "justice" in this case would be for him to be able to sue the FBI agent that mischaracterized the image as porn to get the arrest warrant (she later testified that it was not, which should kill the case right there), Best Buy for conducting illegal surveillance, and the government for wrongful prosecution. However, all of those cases are long shots. The most likely outcome is yet another example of the extreme injustices perpetrated by law enforcement agencies against innocent US citizens on a daily basis. The worst part is that the catalyst of most of these injustices is money - individual law enforcement agents wanting to advance their government careers or pad their resumes to get better paying jobs in the private sector. The whole thing is disgusting.
We as people just need to stop judging people based on assertion and innuendo. If someone is merely accused of something, and there's no evidence to back the charges, we need to judge (or refrain from judging) appropriately.
Similarly, if someone is not accused or convicted of a crime, despite having obviously committed (such as the police officers who murdered Kelley Thomas), we need to feel free to come to our own conclusions.
> We as people just need to stop judging people based on assertion and innuendo.
Yes, but.
Public arrest is a crucial freedom (secret arrests are a tool of totalitarian governments everywhere, including the British colonial government and, yes, Guantanamo too).
On the other hand the "perp walk" and other pretrial publicity/propaganda by governments seriously affect the accused's ability to get a fair trial, and should be stopped.
But since society won't change, the justice system needs to. Prosecutors could refuse to file charges in flimsy cases that are highly unlikely to result in convictions, such as the one at issue here. They could also choose not to lie or embellish facts to obtain search or arrest warrants that propel unjust cases forward. Unfortunately, both of these activities seem to be accelerating, not slowing down. We are seeing more and more "novel" prosecutions - those where criminal intent is questionable at best. Prosecutors do these things to pad their stats so that they can get a higher salary when they switch to private practice, but at a tremendous cost to both the defendants and the taxpayers.
Prosecutors could choose to do those things, but our reliance on their good graces is foolish and naive. There is no meaningful feedback for these people when they do wrong. On the contrary, they are often rewarded as you say with higher political office or in private practice. There is no meaningful oversight. This is true for every element of the judiciary, prosecutors, police, and judges alike.
I'm also saying: we need to take accusations from these people with a grain of salt. They're wrong a huge part of the time.
Yes. It's not a simple problem, but it literally means the justice system is failing to deliver justice to society. It's failing at its only function.