Will Steve Ballmer show up at the WWDC keynote?
blogs.barrons.com
blogs.barrons.com
I just can't see them wanting Visual Studio support. It is, pretty much, just better than XCode. Overnight, the superior development platform for an Apple device would be a Windows machine. Unless they're really planning on EOLing OS X and their non iP* businesses, why would they want the best developer environment to be hosted on a rival platform? Killing or abandoning OS X seems insane - desk/laptops still account for 50% of their income, and currently most OS X developers are also targeting iP* devices in parallel with their desktop work. Moreover, the iPhone halo effect is getting them more Mac sales and Mac developers. Whilst they're not hurting for iPhone apps, why give developers the incentive to stop buying Macs, buy Windows, kill off their OS X development, and throw out a hugely profitable segment of Apple's business to gamble on Android not eating their iPhone lunch?
I suspect this is just an analysts "blue sky" nonsense, or a confusion over e.g. development environments for Office 2011 Mac. For reference, this same guy claimed there would be no Mac updates in 2009, and that they'd release a small OLED laptop by the end of 2009. 0 for 2 so far, and I'm guessing 0 for 3.
How so? (Genuinely curious, I have too little experience with either platform to judge.)
Likewise, I can't remember a time when I've seen Xcode's Intellisense-like feature fail, though I can recall several times when Visual Studio's has. (Xcode's method to advance to the next parameter--Ctrl-slash or something--is pretty non-obvious, though.)
At the end of the day, the more quality apps Apple gets on the iPhone, the better it is for them. Better apps = more phone/iPad sales = more halo sales.
I do have to agree with you on your 0 for 3 call, but what do I know. It'd definitely be exciting.
(Seriously; VS2010. If you assume it's about new-developer mindshare then at the moment Android has one huge advantage - you don't need to buy a Mac.)
I'm suspicious of the idea that any company of Microsoft's size and maturity has a coherent strategic direction. Apple's an exception, but it's not a business: it's a totalitarian command economy with shareholders.
I'm going to go out on a limb as say, probably not.
There's the growing theme that Apple and Microsoft are pals in their fight against Google. This is positively insane. Apple is absolutely devastating Microsoft's core foundation in a way that some shitty online spreadsheet hasn't.
Not to mention that this is the antithesis of pretty much everything that Jobs recently said about Adobe.
Apple doesn't need to woo developers, or expand their development platform. They have a lot of top notch apps, an overflowing app store, and everyone is rushing the door to get their chance at having their app denied. Maybe in a few years, if Android or WM7 really takes off, this will be a concern, but not now.