http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/why-cant-silicon-...
http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/20/9179853/tech-diversity-sco...
https://medium.com/tech-diversity-files/thought-on-diversity...
Why don't I ever see it being discussed on HN?
But just because you don't ever see it discussed on HN doesn't mean that it isn't. Try out the HN search engine:
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=racism&sort=byPopularity&prefi...
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=african%20american&sort=byPopu...
Here's a discussion last year on the YC blog post that was titled, "YC Open Office Hours for Black and Hispanic Founders"
Many of us, myself included, fight on behalf of a lot of underrepresented groups on HN as best we can.
I'm sorry if you haven't seen it, but I assure you some people here are trying.
In the meantime, I note that you could have chosen, in response to a post on International Women's Day, to show appreciation to black _women_ and latina _women_ in tech, and recognize the issues that they face on all of these fronts. You chose not to do so. Hence it seems to me like your purpose here might be to draw attention away from those women, because you don't think they need your support or solidarity. Was that your intent?
http://www.blackgirlscode.com/ https://www.devcolor.org/
I remember reading this particular blog entry via HN: https://blog.devcolor.org/on-being-a-black-man-42ecb7946fe0
The disparity you're talking about could be because there are more women in tech (just underrepresented in C-level roles or whatever it might be) likely to speak up, whereas black people are underrepresented in tech full stop?
Weasel words. The discussion happens, it is out there, you can find it. Who is to blame if you ignore it?
Thanks, I was looking for a way to call people disingenuous without actually using the term, since it's apparently become a no-no word on HN.