What's that query supposed to return?
Whenever I mention this bug I'm challenged with how to refer to it in a way that humans will be able to understand (without resorting to base64 or similar...) but which Google's indexer won't "get", so that the bug stays there and I'm able to point it out to people.
My point is that Google's correlation system is nowhere near perfect. (I would intuitively categorize this with the much-vaunted systems that determine context, "did you mean" etc.)